You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LOCALIZER: subcellular localization prediction of both plant and effector proteins in the plant cell
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep44598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana Sperschneider, Ann-Maree Catanzariti, Kathleen DeBoer, Benjamin Petre, Donald M. Gardiner, Karam B. Singh, Peter N. Dodds, Jennifer M. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 366 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 25% |
| Researcher | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 85 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 144 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 100 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 98 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,953,055
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#38,507
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,975
of 326,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,362
of 4,637 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,637 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.