↓ Skip to main content

Effects of high-intensity circuit training, low-intensity circuit training and endurance training on blood pressure and lipoproteins in middle-aged overweight men

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of high-intensity circuit training, low-intensity circuit training and endurance training on blood pressure and lipoproteins in middle-aged overweight men
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-511x-12-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Paoli, Quirico F Pacelli, Tatiana Moro, Giuseppe Marcolin, Marco Neri, Giuseppe Battaglia, Giuseppe Sergi, Francesco Bolzetta, Antonino Bianco

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the physiological effects of an high-intensity circuit training (HICT) on several cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy, overweight middle-aged subjects, and to compare the effects of HICT to traditional endurance training (ET) and low-intensity circuit training (LICT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 374 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 19%
Student > Master 55 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Researcher 20 5%
Student > Postgraduate 15 4%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 130 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 107 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 146 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#855,740
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#64
of 1,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,061
of 204,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.