↓ Skip to main content

Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
802 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002817.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L Tomlinson, Smitaa Patel, Charmaine Meek, Clare P Herd, Carl E Clarke, Rebecca Stowe, Laila Shah, Catherine M Sackley, Katherine HO Deane, Keith Wheatley, Natalie Ives

Abstract

Despite medical therapies and surgical interventions for Parkinson's disease (PD), patients develop progressive disability. Physiotherapy aims to maximise functional ability and minimise secondary complications through movement rehabilitation within a context of education and support for the whole person. The overall aim is to optimise independence, safety, and well-being, thereby enhancing quality of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 802 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 783 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 161 20%
Student > Master 140 17%
Researcher 86 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 7%
Other 174 22%
Unknown 106 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 274 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 132 16%
Neuroscience 57 7%
Psychology 39 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 4%
Other 135 17%
Unknown 133 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#483,805
of 16,292,334 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,183
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,528
of 165,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,292,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.