You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolism of a nitrogen-enriched coastal marine lagoon during the summertime
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeochemistry, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10533-013-9901-x |
| Authors |
Robert W. Howarth, Melanie Hayn, Roxanne M. Marino, Neil Ganju, Kenneth Foreman, Karen McGlathery, Anne E. Giblin, Peter Berg, Jeffrey D. Walker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,625,854
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#298
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,016
of 200,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.