You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An ENU mutagenesis screen identifies novel and known genes involved in epigenetic processes in the mouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucia Daxinger, Sarah K Harten, Harald Oey, Trevor Epp, Luke Isbel, Edward Huang, Nadia Whitelaw, Anwyn Apedaile, Anabel Sorolla, Joan Yong, Vandhana Bharti, Joanne Sutton, Alyson Ashe, Zhenyi Pang, Nathan Wallace, Daniel J Gerhardt, Marnie E Blewitt, Jeffrey A Jeddeloh, Emma Whitelaw |
| Abstract |
We have used a sensitized ENU mutagenesis screen to produce mouse lines that carry mutations in genes required for epigenetic regulation. We call these lines Modifiers of murine metastable epialleles (Mommes). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 33% |
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,475,150
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,479
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,628
of 210,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.