↓ Skip to main content

Two-year outcome of internet-based relapse prevention for partially remitted depression

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-year outcome of internet-based relapse prevention for partially remitted depression
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2013.08.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredrik Holländare, Susanne A. Anthony, Mia Randestad, Maria Tillfors, Per Carlbring, Gerhard Andersson, Ingemar Engström

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the long-term effects of internet-based relapse prevention for sufferers of partially remitted depression. Eighty-four individuals with partially remitted unipolar depression were randomized to either internet-based CBT (iCBT) or to a control group. After the ten week intervention period the participants were followed for 24 months and diagnostic interviews conducted to detect relapse. The intervention and monthly self-ratings of depressive symptoms were administered via an internet-based platform that ensured secure communication with all participants. Significantly fewer participants in the iCBT group had experienced a relapse compared with those in the control group two years after the internet-based intervention. The relapse rate in the iCBT group was 13.7% (CI 95%=2.5-24.9) and in the control group it was 60.9% (CI 95%=44.8-77). Furthermore, a significantly larger proportion of the iCBT group experienced remission two years after the intervention compared with the control group. Internet-based CBT seems promising for preventing relapse in sufferers of partially remitted depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,117,227
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#2,258
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,894
of 195,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.