↓ Skip to main content

Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiro Kinoshita, Toshi A Furukawa, Kuni Kinoshita, Mina Honyashiki, Ichiro M Omori, Max Marshall, Gary R Bond, Peter Huxley, Naoji Amano, David Kingdon

Abstract

People who suffer from severe mental disorder experience high rates of unemployment. Supported employment is an approach to vocational rehabilitation that involves trying to place clients in competitive jobs without any extended preparation. The Individual placement and support (IPS) model is a carefully specified form of supported employment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 282 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 19%
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 42 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 53 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 18%
Psychology 48 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 53 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#534,204
of 15,045,842 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,483
of 11,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,805
of 163,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,045,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.