↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009884.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazel A Billson, Cathrine Holland, Janet Curwell, Valerie L Davey, Laura Kinsey, Lianna J Lawton, Alison J Whitworth, Sorrel Burden

Abstract

Women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at significant risk of malnutrition with incidence rates described as being between 28% to 67%. Nutrition interventions may improve clinical outcomes positively, nutritional status or quality of life measures in this patient group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 25%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,848,873
of 15,892,757 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,302
of 11,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,188
of 165,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,892,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.