↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Primary Care, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Tinsel, Anika Buchholz, Werner Vach, Achim Siegel, Thorsten Dürk, Angela Buchholz, Wilhelm Niebling, Karl-Georg Fischer

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the key factors causing cardiovascular diseases. A substantial proportion of treated hypertensive patients do not reach recommended target blood pressure values. Shared decision making (SDM) is to enhance the active role of patients. As until now there exists little information on the effects of SDM training in antihypertensive therapy, we tested the effect of an SDM training programme for general practitioners (GPs). Our hypotheses are that this SDM training (1) enhances the participation of patients and (2) leads to an enhanced decrease in blood pressure (BP) values, compared to patients receiving usual care without prior SDM training for GPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 42 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 47 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#2,212
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,203
of 210,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#39
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.