You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta‐agonist treatment of acute asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000052.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J Cates, Emma J Welsh, Brian H Rowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 26% |
| United States | 19 | 11% |
| Spain | 14 | 8% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 23% |
| Scientists | 17 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 13% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Researcher | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 18% |
| Unknown | 149 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 6% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Unknown | 160 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#240,453
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#403
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 212,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.