↓ Skip to main content

Combining heavy quark spin and local hidden gauge symmetries in the dynamical generation of hidden charm baryons

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Combining heavy quark spin and local hidden gauge symmetries in the dynamical generation of hidden charm baryons
Published in
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, September 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.88.056012
Authors

C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, E. Oset

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 80%
Unspecified 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#10,225,608
of 12,803,979 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#7,916
of 13,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,041
of 157,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#238
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,803,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,422 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.