↓ Skip to main content

Myths and misconceptions about tuberculosis transmission in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myths and misconceptions about tuberculosis transmission in Ghana
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-13-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Amo-Adjei, Akwasi Kumi-Kyereme

Abstract

Myths and misconceptions about TB can serve as a barrier to efforts at reducing stigmatisation of people infected and affected by the disease. Understanding such drivers of myths and misconceptions is important for improving information, education and communication (IEC) efforts of national control and preventive interventions. This study therefore assesses the influence of interaction of spatial, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics on myths and misconceptions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,828
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,705
of 210,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#252
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.