↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2004
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-2-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelos G Papanikolaou, Nikos Plachouras, Aikaterini Drougia, Styliani Andronikou, Christina Vlachou, Theodoros Stefos, Evangelos Paraskevaidis, Konstantinos Zikopoulos

Abstract

The objective of this randomized prospective study was to compare the efficacy of 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol and 3 mg dinoprostone, administered every nine hours for a maximum of three doses, for elective induction of labor in a specific cohort of nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix and more than 40 weeks of gestation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Postgraduate 11 16%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2013.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#621
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,683
of 75,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.