↓ Skip to main content

The Autopsy of Chicken Nuggets Reads “Chicken Little”

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 5,873)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
748 tweeters
facebook
175 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The Autopsy of Chicken Nuggets Reads “Chicken Little”
Published in
American Journal of Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard D. deShazo, Steven Bigler, Leigh Baldwin Skipworth

Abstract

To determine the contents of chicken nuggets from 2 national food chains.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 748 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Puerto Rico 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Unspecified 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 914. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,447
of 13,098,485 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#4
of 5,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41
of 158,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,098,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.