You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Movement patterns of an arboreal marsupial at the edge of its range: a case study of the koala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2051-3933-1-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Davies, Galina Gramotnev, Leonie Seabrook, Adrian Bradley, Greg Baxter, Jonathan Rhodes, Daniel Lunney, Clive McAlpine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,157,490
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#153
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,941
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them