↓ Skip to main content

Effect of comprehensive lifestyle changes on telomerase activity and telomere length in men with biopsy-proven low-risk prostate cancer: 5-year follow-up of a descriptive pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 3,718)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
66 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
140 tweeters
facebook
88 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
10 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of comprehensive lifestyle changes on telomerase activity and telomere length in men with biopsy-proven low-risk prostate cancer: 5-year follow-up of a descriptive pilot study
Published in
Lancet Oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70366-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dean Ornish, Jue Lin, June M Chan, Elissa Epel, Colleen Kemp, Gerdi Weidner, Ruth Marlin, Steven J Frenda, Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Jennifer Daubenmier, Ivette Estay, Nancy K Hills, Nita Chainani-Wu, Peter R Carroll, Elizabeth H Blackburn, Ornish D, Lin J, Chan JM, Epel E, Kemp C, Weidner G, Marlin R, Frenda SJ, Magbanua MJ, Daubenmier J, Estay I, Hills NK, Chainani-Wu N, Carroll PR, Blackburn EH

Abstract

Telomere shortness in human beings is a prognostic marker of ageing, disease, and premature morbidity. We previously found an association between 3 months of comprehensive lifestyle changes and increased telomerase activity in human immune-system cells. We followed up participants to investigate long-term effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
United Kingdom 8 3%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Czech Republic 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 217 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 18%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Other 68 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 25%
Psychology 30 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Unspecified 15 6%
Other 48 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 742. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,836
of 8,655,898 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#8
of 3,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53
of 126,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,655,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.