You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and encephalomyelitis disseminata/multiple sclerosis show remarkable levels of similarity in phenomenology and neuroimmune characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerwyn Morris, Michael Maes |
| Abstract |
'Encephalomyelitis disseminata' (multiple sclerosis) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are both classified as diseases of the central nervous system by the World Health Organization. This review aims to compare the phenomenological and neuroimmune characteristics of MS with those of ME/CFS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 61 | 24% |
| United States | 28 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Finland | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 117 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 222 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 8% |
| Scientists | 9 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 20% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#205,703
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#174
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,426
of 214,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.