↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of group stepping stones triple p: a mixed-disability trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Family Process, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial of group stepping stones triple p: a mixed-disability trial.
Published in
Family Process, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/famp.12016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Roux, Kate Sofronoff, Matthew Sanders, Roux G, Sofronoff K, Sanders M, Roux, Gemma, Sofronoff, Kate, Sanders, Matthew

Abstract

Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP) is a parenting program designed for families of a child with a disability. The current study involved a randomized controlled trial of Group Stepping Stones Triple P (GSSTP) for a mixed-disability group. Participants were 52 families of children diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder, Down syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, or an intellectual disability. The results demonstrated significant improvements in parent-reported child behavior, parenting styles, parental satisfaction, and conflict about parenting. Results among participants were similar despite children's differing impairments. The intervention effect was maintained at 6-month follow-up. The results indicate that GSSTP is a promising intervention for a mixed-disability group. Limitations of the study, along with areas for future research, are also discussed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Unspecified 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Other 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,682,461
of 8,958,263 outputs
Outputs from Family Process
#134
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,755
of 138,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Process
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,958,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.