You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Galaxy tools and workflows for sequence analysis with applications in molecular plant pathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J.A. Cock, Björn A. Grüning, Konrad Paszkiewicz, Leighton Pritchard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 187 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,198,128
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#1,204
of 15,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,419
of 217,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.