↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patients
Published in
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1164-7-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Cummings, Robyn A Capobianco

Abstract

Sacroiliac joint (SI) pain is an often-overlooked cause of low back pain due, in part, to lack of specific findings on radiographs and symptoms mimicking other back-related disorders. We report our experience with minimally invasive (MIS) SI joint arthrodesis using a series of triangular, titanium plasma spray (TPS) coated implants in patients refractory to conservative care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Engineering 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,903,263
of 3,628,563 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#16
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,079
of 91,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.