↓ Skip to main content

Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006624.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Joaquim I Silveira da Mota Neto, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation (atypical) antipsychotics have become first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examine how the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 39%
Psychology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,575,219
of 15,757,394 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,082
of 11,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,529
of 168,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,757,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.