↓ Skip to main content

Rhombomere-specific analysis reveals the repertoire of genetic cues expressed across the developing hindbrain

Overview of attention for article published in Neural Development, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 203)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhombomere-specific analysis reveals the repertoire of genetic cues expressed across the developing hindbrain
Published in
Neural Development, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1749-8104-4-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Chambers, Leigh Jane Wilson, Fabienne Alfonsi, Ewan Hunter, Uma Saxena, Eric Blanc, Andrew Lumsden

Abstract

The Hox family of homeodomain transcription factors comprises pivotal regulators of cell specification and identity during animal development. However, despite their well-defined roles in the establishment of anteroposterior pattern and considerable research into their mechanism of action, relatively few target genes have been identified in the downstream regulatory network. We have sought to investigate this issue, focussing on the developing hindbrain and the cranial motor neurons that arise from this region. The reiterated anteroposterior compartments of the developing hindbrain (rhombomeres (r)) are normally patterned by the combinatorial action of distinct Hox genes. Alteration in the normal pattern of Hox cues in this region results in a transformation of cellular identity to match the remaining Hox profile, similar to that observed in Drosophila homeotic transformations.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,657,047
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#16
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,961
of 174,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them