↓ Skip to main content

Maximizing Tibial Coverage Is Detrimental to Proper Rotational Alignment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maximizing Tibial Coverage Is Detrimental to Proper Rotational Alignment
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3047-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey Martin, Alex Saurez, Sabir Ismaily, Kashif Ashfaq, Philip Noble, Stephen J. Incavo

Abstract

Traditionally, the placement of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has focused on maximizing coverage of the tibial surface. However, the degree to which maximal coverage affects correct rotational placement of symmetric and asymmetric tibial components has not been well defined and might represent an implant design issue worthy of further inquiry.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 59%
Engineering 7 19%
Unspecified 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#10,530,775
of 13,219,841 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,671
of 5,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,770
of 162,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#84
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,219,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.