↓ Skip to main content

Influenza vaccine for children and adults with bronchiectasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influenza vaccine for children and adults with bronchiectasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006218.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina C Chang, Peter S Morris, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is a major cause of respiratory morbidity especially in developing countries. In affluent countries, bronchiectasis is increasingly recognised in certain subsections of communities (e.g. Aboriginal communities) as well as a coexistent disease/comorbidity and disease modifier in respiratory diseases such as COPD (reported rates of 29-50% in adults). Respiratory exacerbations in people with bronchiectasis are associated with reduced quality of life, accelerated pulmonary decline, hospitalisation and even death. Current recommendations for inactivated influenza vaccination includes adults aged 65 years and over, those in residential care and health care workers and also all adults and children with chronic illness, particularly cardiac and pulmonary diseases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Taiwan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Other 5 6%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,230,379
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,153
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,791
of 159,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.