↓ Skip to main content

Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006764.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona C Brownfoot, Daniela I Gagliardi, Emily Bain, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, there is currently no consensus as to the type of corticosteroid to use; nor the dose, frequency, timing of use or the route of administration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 339 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 17%
Student > Bachelor 57 16%
Student > Postgraduate 38 11%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Other 79 22%
Unknown 51 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 63 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,927,437
of 16,541,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,591
of 11,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,142
of 171,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,541,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.