↓ Skip to main content

D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001073.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mosarrat J Qureshi, Manoj Kumar

Abstract

The rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in moderately premature infants has decreased dramatically with improved care in the neonatal intensive care unit. A low rate of this disorder was unexpectedly observed among infants treated with intravenous D-penicillamine to prevent hyperbilirubinaemia. This observation led to the investigation of its use, both enterally as well as intravenously, to prevent ROP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Unspecified 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 13 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,509,591
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,944
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,678
of 160,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.