↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the quality of international orthopedic medical mission trips using the blue distinction criteria for knee and hip replacement centers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing the quality of international orthopedic medical mission trips using the blue distinction criteria for knee and hip replacement centers
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle E Dempsey, Roya Ghazinouri, Desiree Diez, Luis Alcantara, Carolyn Beagan, Barbara Aggouras, Monica Hoagland, Thomas S Thornhill, Jeffrey N Katz

Abstract

Several organizations seek to address the growing burden of arthritis in developing countries by providing total joint replacements (TJR) to patients with advanced arthritis who otherwise would not have access to these procedures. Because these mission trips operate in resource poor environments, some of the features typically associated with high quality care may be difficult to implement. In the U.S., many hospitals that perform TJRs use the Blue Cross/Shield's Blue Distinction criteria as benchmarks of high quality care. Although these criteria were designed for use in the U.S., we applied them to Operation Walk (Op-Walk) Boston's medical mission trip to the Dominican Republic. Evaluating the program using these criteria illustrated that the program provides high quality care and, more importantly, helped the program to find areas of improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 15%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,392,121
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,902
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,207
of 202,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#38
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.