↓ Skip to main content

Can We Predict Plan Quality for External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation: Results of a Multicenter Feasibility Study (Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 06.02)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Can We Predict Plan Quality for External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation: Results of a Multicenter Feasibility Study (Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 06.02)
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Kron, David Willis, Emma Link, Margot Lehman, Gillian Campbell, Peter O'Brien, Boon Chua

Abstract

Partial breast irradiation (PBI) after lumpectomy may be an option for selected patients with early breast cancer. A feasibility study of accelerated PBI delivered using external beam 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (RT) was undertaken at 8 Australasian centers. The present study evaluated the impact of patient, tumor, and RT technique-related factors on the quality of RT plans as determined by the dose-volume parameters of organs at risk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 43%
Physics and Astronomy 4 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,936,020
of 12,066,743 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#3,633
of 5,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,668
of 150,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#23
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,066,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.