↓ Skip to main content

The role of the pediatrician in family-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders: opportunities and challenges.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Adolescent Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
45 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of the pediatrician in family-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders: opportunities and challenges.
Published in
Journal of Adolescent Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katzman, Debra K., Peebles, Rebecka, Sawyer, Susan M., Lock, James, Le Grange, Daniel, Katzman DK, Peebles R, Sawyer SM, Lock J, Le Grange D, Debra K. Katzman, Rebecka Peebles, Susan M. Sawyer, James Lock, Daniel Le Grange

Abstract

Empiric research supports that family-based treatment (FBT) is an effective treatment for adolescents with eating disorders. This review outlines the role of the pediatrician in FBT for adolescent eating disorders, specifically focusing on how pediatric care changes during treatment, and discusses current challenges and misconceptions regarding FBT. Although FBT introduces unique challenges to pediatricians trained in earlier eating disorder treatment approaches, effective support of the approach by pediatricians is critical to its success.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
France 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 37 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2016.
All research outputs
#272,096
of 8,247,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescent Health
#175
of 2,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,534
of 139,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescent Health
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,247,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.