You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Racism as a determinant of health: a protocol for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yin Paradies, Naomi Priest, Jehonathan Ben, Mandy Truong, Arpana Gupta, Alex Pieterse, Margaret Kelaher, Gilbert Gee |
| Abstract |
Racism is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of health. A growing body of epidemiological evidence shows strong associations between self-reported racism and poor health outcomes across diverse minority groups in developed countries. While the relationship between racism and health has received increasing attention over the last two decades, a comprehensive meta-analysis focused on the health effects of racism has yet to be conducted. The aim of this review protocol is to provide a structure from which to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assess the relationship between racism and health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 64 | 42% |
| United States | 16 | 11% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 13% |
| Scientists | 15 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
| Psychology | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#363,981
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#35
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,704
of 215,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.