↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating acute dental pain: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in British Dental Journal, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating acute dental pain: a systematic review
Published in
British Dental Journal, May 1998
DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809654
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Ernst, M H Pittler

Abstract

Acupuncture is frequently advocated as an effective treatment of dental pain. The question whether or not it is effective for this indication remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review therefore was to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture in dental pain. Four electronic databases were searched: Medline, Embase, CISCOM, and the Cochrane Library. Only controlled trials were included in this review. Information was extracted from included studies and entered on standard forms independently by both authors. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad score. 16 such studies were located. The majority of these trials imply that acupuncture is effective in dental analgesia. However, important questions remain unanswered. It is concluded that acupuncture can alleviate dental pain and that future investigations should define the optimal acupuncture technique and its relative efficacy compared with conventional methods of analgesia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Uruguay 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,527,682
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from British Dental Journal
#309
of 6,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#663
of 34,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Dental Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them