↓ Skip to main content

The prognostic value of Her4 receptor isoform expression in triple-negative and Her2 positive breast cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prognostic value of Her4 receptor isoform expression in triple-negative and Her2 positive breast cancer patients
Published in
BMC Cancer, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Machleidt, Stefan Buchholz, Simone Diermeier-Daucher, Florian Zeman, Olaf Ortmann, Gero Brockhoff

Abstract

Not only four but rather seven different human epidermal growth factor receptor related (Her) receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) have been described to be expressed in a variety of normal and neoplastic tissues: Her1, Her2, Her3, and additionally four Her4 isoforms have been identified. A differential expression of Her4 isoforms does not, however, play any role in either the molecular diagnostics or treatment decision for breast cancer patients. The prognostic and predictive impact of Her4 expression in breast cancer is basically unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 47%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,929,940
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,832
of 8,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,745
of 203,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#16
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.