You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assets and Poverty Traps in Rural Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Development Studies, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00220388.2013.785524 |
| Authors |
Agnes R. Quisumbing, Bob Baulch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 31% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 33 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Development Studies
#1,655
of 1,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,885
of 206,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Development Studies
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.