↓ Skip to main content

Assets and Poverty Traps in Rural Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Development Studies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Assets and Poverty Traps in Rural Bangladesh
Published in
Journal of Development Studies, July 2013
DOI 10.1080/00220388.2013.785524
Authors

Agnes R. Quisumbing, Bob Baulch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Kenya 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Bangladesh 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 33%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 47%
Social Sciences 12 22%
Unspecified 6 11%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,268,286
of 8,073,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Development Studies
#501
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,160
of 138,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Development Studies
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,073,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.