You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000419.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefano Ricci, Maria Grazia Celani, Teresa Anna Cantisani, Enrico Righetti |
Abstract |
Piracetam has neuroprotective and antithrombotic effects that may help to reduce death and disability in people with acute stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2006 and 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 33% |
Indonesia | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 35 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,397,218
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,988
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,312
of 187,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.