↓ Skip to main content

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily M Begley, Gillian Ml Gyte, Deirdre J Murphy, Declan Devane, Susan J McDonald, William McGuire, Begley, Cecily M, Gyte, Gillian ML, Murphy, Deirdre J, Devane, Declan, McDonald, Susan J, McGuire, William

Abstract

Active management of the third stage of labour involves giving a prophylactic uterotonic, early cord clamping and controlled cord traction to deliver the placenta. With expectant management, signs of placental separation are awaited and the placenta is delivered spontaneously. Active management was introduced to try to reduce haemorrhage, a major contributor to maternal mortality in low-income countries.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,899,029
of 3,630,978 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,695
of 6,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,013
of 92,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,630,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.