You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecily M Begley, Gillian Ml Gyte, Deirdre J Murphy, Declan Devane, Susan J McDonald, William McGuire, Begley, Cecily M, Gyte, Gillian ML, Murphy, Deirdre J, Devane, Declan, McDonald, Susan J, McGuire, William |
| Abstract |
Active management of the third stage of labour involves giving a prophylactic uterotonic, early cord clamping and controlled cord traction to deliver the placenta. With expectant management, signs of placental separation are awaited and the placenta is delivered spontaneously. Active management was introduced to try to reduce haemorrhage, a major contributor to maternal mortality in low-income countries. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,203,867
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,991
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,828
of 94,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.