↓ Skip to main content

Mercury and water level fluctuations in lakes of northern Minnesota

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mercury and water level fluctuations in lakes of northern Minnesota
Published in
bioRxiv, March 2017
DOI 10.1101/118638
Authors

James H Larson, Ryan P. Maki, Victoria G. Christensen, Mark B. Sandheinrich, Jaime F. LeDuc, Claire Kissane, Brent C Knights

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,207,944
of 14,571,953 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#56,324
of 76,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,346
of 264,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#2,035
of 2,256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,571,953 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.