↓ Skip to main content

Age and geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in a representative sample of children living in Burkitt lymphoma-endemic areas of northern Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age and geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in a representative sample of children living in Burkitt lymphoma-endemic areas of northern Uganda
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12936-017-1778-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlena Maziarz, Tobias Kinyera, Isaac Otim, Paul Kagwa, Hadijah Nabalende, Ismail D. Legason, Martin D. Ogwang, Samuel Kirimunda, Benjamin Emmanuel, Steven J. Reynolds, Patrick Kerchan, Moses M. Joloba, Andrew W. Bergen, Kishor Bhatia, Ambrose O. Talisuna, Robert J. Biggar, James J. Goedert, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Sam M. Mbulaiteye

Abstract

Falciparum malaria is an important risk factor for African Burkitt lymphoma (BL), but few studies have evaluated malaria patterns in healthy BL-age children in populations where both diseases are endemic. To obtain accurate current data, patterns of asymptomatic malaria were investigated in northern Uganda, where BL is endemic. Between 2011 and 2015, 1150 apparently healthy children under 15 years old were sampled from 100 villages in northern Uganda using a stratified, multi-stage, cluster survey design. Falciparum malaria prevalence (pfPR) was assessed by questionnaire, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and thick film microscopy (TFM). Weighted pfPR and unadjusted and adjusted associations of prevalence with covariates were calculated using logistic models and survey methods. Based on 1143 children successfully tested, weighted pfPR was 54.8% by RDT and 43.4% by TFM. RDT sensitivity and specificity were 97.5 and 77.8%, respectively, as compared to TFM, because RDT detect malaria antigens, which persist in peripheral blood after clinical malaria, thus results based on RDT are reported. Weighted pfPR increased from 40% in children aged under 2 years to 61.8% in children aged 6-8 years (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-4.65), then fell slightly to 49% in those aged 12-15 years. Geometric mean parasite density was 1805.5 parasites/µL (95% CI 1344.6-2424.3) among TFM-positive participants, and it was higher in children aged <5 years at 5092.9/µL (95% CI 2892.7-8966.8) and lower in those aged ≥10 years at 983.8/µL (95% CI 472.7-2047.4; P = 0.001). Weighted pfPR was lower in children residing in sub-regions employing indoor residual spraying (IRS) than in those residing in non-IRS sub-regions (32.8 versus 65.7%; OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14, 0.46). However, pfPR varied both within IRS (3.2-55.3%) and non-IRS sub-regions (29.8-75.8%; Pheterogeneity <0.001). pfPR was inversely correlated with a child's mother's income (P = 0.011) and positively correlated with being enrolled in the wet season (P = 0.076), but sex was irrelevant. The study observed high but geographically and demographically heterogenous patterns of asymptomatic malaria prevalence among children living in northern Uganda. These results provide important baseline data that will enable precise evaluation of associations between malaria and BL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,544,912
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,543
of 5,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,672
of 309,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#78
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.