↓ Skip to main content

A reappraisal of the mucoactive activity and clinical efficacy of bromhexine

Overview of attention for article published in Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A reappraisal of the mucoactive activity and clinical efficacy of bromhexine
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40248-017-0088-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Zanasi, Massimiliano Mazzolini, Ahmad Kantar

Abstract

Since its introduction to the market in 1963, bromhexine, an over-the-counter drug, has been investigated for its activity in animal models and in humans with diverse respiratory conditions. Bromhexine is a derivate of the Adhatoda vasica plant used in some countries for the treatment of various respiratory diseases. Bromhexine has been found to enhance the secretion of various mucus components by modifying the physicochemical characteristics of mucus. These changes, in turn, increase mucociliary clearance and reduce cough. Principal clinical research studies were primarily developed in an era when stringent methodological approaches and good clinical practices were not developed yet. Clinical studies were conducted mainly in patients with chronic bronchitis and in patients with various respiratory diseases, and demonstrated the efficacy of bromhexine in improving respiratory symptoms. Furthermore, the co-administration of antibiotics with bromhexine amplified the actions of the antibiotic. Although the clinical evidence shows only modest but positive results, bromhexine is indicated for its mucoactive activity. Larger trials with adequate methodology are required to identify when treatment with bromhexine can improve clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 52 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 51 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,755,459
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#59
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,861
of 324,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.