You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010192.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Bourke, Kate E Homer, Mohamed A Thaha, Liz Steed, Derek J Rosario, Karen A Robb, John M Saxton, Stephanie JC Taylor |
| Abstract |
The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent. However, how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood. A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations. Hence, reviewing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 20% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Scientists | 11 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 417 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 15% |
| Researcher | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 81 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 32% |
| Sports and Recreations | 48 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 11% |
| Psychology | 42 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 11% |
| Unknown | 91 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,615,812
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,412
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,146
of 216,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.