↓ Skip to main content

Colonization pressure as a risk factor for colonization by multiresistant Acinetobacter spp and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colonization pressure as a risk factor for colonization by multiresistant Acinetobacter spp and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive care unit
Published in
Clinics, August 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(08)11
Pubmed ID
Authors

MF DalBen, M Basso, CP Garcia, SF Costa, CM Toscano, WR Jarvis, RD Lobo, MS Oliveira, AS Levin

Abstract

To determine factors associated with colonization by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#11,193,855
of 14,116,115 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#345
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,579
of 165,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,116,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.