↓ Skip to main content

A reappraisal of the Meese–Rogoff puzzle

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Economics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
A reappraisal of the Meese–Rogoff puzzle
Published in
Applied Economics, September 2013
DOI 10.1080/00036846.2013.829202
Authors

Imad Moosa, Kelly Burns

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Psychology 2 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,161,299
of 4,505,285 outputs
Outputs from Applied Economics
#428
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,100
of 98,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Economics
#38
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.