You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009020.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Yemisi Takwoingi, Renea V Johnston, Nigel CA Hanchard, Flávio Faloppa |
| Abstract |
Shoulder pain is a very common symptom. Disorders of the rotator cuff tendons due to wear or tear are among the most common causes of shoulder pain and disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and ultrasound (US) are increasingly being used to assess the presence and size of rotator cuff tears to assist in planning surgical treatment. It is not known whether one imaging method is superior to any of the others. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 535 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 98 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 11% |
| Researcher | 55 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 118 | 22% |
| Unknown | 130 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 238 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 8% |
| Unknown | 158 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#547,288
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#963
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,296
of 218,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.