↓ Skip to main content

Size and space controlled hexagonal arrays of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanodots: magnetic studies and application

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Size and space controlled hexagonal arrays of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanodots: magnetic studies and application
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02772
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tandra Ghoshal, Tuhin Maity, Ramsankar Senthamaraikannan, Matthew T. Shaw, Patrick Carolan, Justin D. Holmes, Saibal Roy, Michael A. Morris

Abstract

Highly dense hexagonally arranged iron oxide nanodots array were fabricated using PS-b-PEO self-assembled patterns. The copolymer molecular weight, composition and choice of annealing solvent/s allows dimensional and structural control of the nanopatterns at large scale. A mechanism is proposed to create scaffolds through degradation and/or modification of cylindrical domains. A methodology based on selective metal ion inclusion and subsequent processing was used to create iron oxide nanodots array. The nanodots have uniform size and shape and their placement mimics the original self-assembled nanopatterns. For the first time these precisely defined and size selective systems of ordered nanodots allow careful investigation of magnetic properties in dimensions from 50 nm to 10 nm, which delineate the nanodots are superparamagnetic, well-isolated and size monodispersed. This diameter/spacing controlled iron oxide nanodots systems were demonstrated as a resistant mask over silicon to fabricate densely packed, identical ordered, high aspect ratio silicon nanopillars and nanowire features.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 36%
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 17 29%
Chemistry 16 28%
Physics and Astronomy 7 12%
Engineering 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 7 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#9,583,897
of 12,476,446 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#37,653
of 57,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,866
of 160,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#72
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,476,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.