↓ Skip to main content

Cycle scheduling for in vitro fertilization with oral contraceptive pills versus oral estradiol valerate: a randomized, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cycle scheduling for in vitro fertilization with oral contraceptive pills versus oral estradiol valerate: a randomized, controlled trial
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-11-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik E Hauzman, Azucena Zapata, Alfonso Bermejo, Carlos Iglesias, Antonio Pellicer, Juan A Garcia-Velasco

Abstract

Both oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and estradiol (E2) valerate have been used to schedule gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and, consequently, laboratory activities. However, there are no studies comparing treatment outcomes directly between these two pretreatment methods. This randomized controlled trial was aimed at finding differences in ongoing pregnancy rates between GnRH antagonist IVF cycles scheduled with OCPs or E2 valerate.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,615
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#204
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,071
of 204,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them