↓ Skip to main content

A prospective case–control and molecular epidemiological study of human cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective case–control and molecular epidemiological study of human cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in New Zealand
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Jaros, Adrian L Cookson, Donald M Campbell, Thomas E Besser, Smriti Shringi, Graham F Mackereth, Esther Lim, Liza Lopez, Muriel Dufour, Jonathan C Marshall, Michael G Baker, Steve Hathaway, Deborah J Prattley, Nigel P French

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 and related non-O157 STEC strains are enteric pathogens of public health concern worldwide, causing life-threatening diseases. Cattle are considered the principal hosts and have been shown to be a source of infection for both foodborne and environmental outbreaks in humans. The aims of this study were to investigate risk factors associated with sporadic STEC infections in humans in New Zealand and to provide epidemiological information about the source and exposure pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Other 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,280,625
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,439
of 7,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,811
of 205,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#84
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.