You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide meta-analyses identify three loci associated with primary biliary cirrhosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.627 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiangdong Liu, Pietro Invernizzi, Yue Lu, Roman Kosoy, Yan Lu, Ilaria Bianchi, Mauro Podda, Chun Xu, Gang Xie, Fabio Macciardi, Carlo Selmi, Sara Lupoli, Russell Shigeta, Michael Ransom, Ana Lleo, Annette T Lee, Andrew L Mason, Robert P Myers, Kevork M Peltekian, Cameron N Ghent, Francesca Bernuzzi, Massimo Zuin, Floriano Rosina, Elisabetta Borghesio, Annarosa Floreani, Roberta Lazzari, Grazia Niro, Angelo Andriulli, Luigi Muratori, Paolo Muratori, Piero L Almasio, Pietro Andreone, Marzia Margotti, Maurizia Brunetto, Barbara Coco, Domenico Alvaro, Maria C Bragazzi, Fabio Marra, Alessandro Pisano, Cristina Rigamonti, Massimo Colombo, Marco Marzioni, Antonio Benedetti, Luca Fabris, Mario Strazzabosco, Piero Portincasa, Vincenzo O Palmieri, Claudio Tiribelli, Lory Croce, Savino Bruno, Sonia Rossi, Maria Vinci, Cleofe Prisco, Alberto Mattalia, Pierluigi Toniutto, Antonio Picciotto, Andrea Galli, Carlo Ferrari, Silvia Colombo, Giovanni Casella, Lorenzo Morini, Nicola Caporaso, Agostino Colli, Giancarlo Spinzi, Renzo Montanari, Peter K Gregersen, E Jenny Heathcote, Gideon M Hirschfield, Katherine A Siminovitch, Christopher I Amos, M Eric Gershwin, Michael F Seldin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Professor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#5,440
of 7,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,147
of 95,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#42
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.