↓ Skip to main content

A Mouse to Human Search for Plasma Proteome Changes Associated with Pancreatic Tumor Development

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
55 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Mouse to Human Search for Plasma Proteome Changes Associated with Pancreatic Tumor Development
Published in
PLOS Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vitor M Faca, Kenneth S Song, Hong Wang, Qing Zhang, Alexei L Krasnoselsky, Lisa F Newcomb, Ruben R Plentz, Sushma Gurumurthy, Mark S Redston, Sharon J Pitteri, Sandra R Pereira-Faca, Renee C Ireton, Hiroyuki Katayama, Veronika Glukhova, Douglas Phanstiel, Dean E Brenner, Michelle A Anderson, David Misek, Nathalie Scholler, Nicole D Urban, Matt J Barnett, Cim Edelstein, Gary E Goodman, Mark D Thornquist, Martin W McIntosh, Ronald A DePinho, Nabeel Bardeesy, Samir M Hanash

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Professor 17 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Chemistry 11 7%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#4,536
of 5,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,944
of 96,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#41
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.