↓ Skip to main content

Experimental liver fibrosis research: update on animal models, legal issues and translational aspects

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental liver fibrosis research: update on animal models, legal issues and translational aspects
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1755-1536-6-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Liedtke, Tom Luedde, Tilman Sauerbruch, David Scholten, Konrad Streetz, Frank Tacke, René Tolba, Christian Trautwein, Jonel Trebicka, Ralf Weiskirchen

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is defined as excessive extracellular matrix deposition and is based on complex interactions between matrix-producing hepatic stellate cells and an abundance of liver-resident and infiltrating cells. Investigation of these processes requires in vitro and in vivo experimental work in animals. However, the use of animals in translational research will be increasingly challenged, at least in countries of the European Union, because of the adoption of new animal welfare rules in 2013. These rules will create an urgent need for optimized standard operating procedures regarding animal experimentation and improved international communication in the liver fibrosis community. This review gives an update on current animal models, techniques and underlying pathomechanisms with the aim of fostering a critical discussion of the limitations and potential of up-to-date animal experimentation. We discuss potential complications in experimental liver fibrosis and provide examples of how the findings of studies in which these models are used can be translated to human disease and therapy. In this review, we want to motivate the international community to design more standardized animal models which might help to address the legally requested replacement, refinement and reduction of animals in fibrosis research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 371 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 19%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 24 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 58 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 3%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 75 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,387,606
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#16
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,885
of 210,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.