↓ Skip to main content

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010395.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Foster C, Richards J, Thorogood M, Hillsdon M, Charles Foster, Justin Richards, Margaret Thorogood, Melvyn Hillsdon, Foster, Charles, Richards, Justin, Thorogood, Margaret, Hillsdon, Melvyn

Abstract

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity (PA) are becoming increasingly popular but their ability to achieve long term changes are unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Psychology 24 11%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 51 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#558,158
of 15,094,326 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,555
of 11,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,316
of 168,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.