You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010392.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Richards, Melvyn Hillsdon, Margaret Thorogood, Charles Foster |
| Abstract |
Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity (PA) are continuing to be popular but their ability to achieve long term changes are unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 31% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Scientists | 11 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 404 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 14% |
| Researcher | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 103 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 12% |
| Psychology | 37 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 115 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,406,887
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,012
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,548
of 219,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.